Archive for October, 2007

Book Review: Colossians Remixed

October 24, 2007 Leave a comment

I recently completed reading Walsh and Keesmat’s “Colossians Remixed: Subverting the Empire.” This book is an interesting genre that I haven’t seen before – part commentary, part biblical paraphrase, part social commentary. To say the least, it’s an interesting read and I’d recommend.

Walsh and Keesmat’s exegesis of Colossians is solid. Their exegesis of Colossians is well done with Christology at the center. Their creative use of stories and targums offer great suggestions for pastors who preach week to week. Walsh and Keesmat also do a great job setting Colossians in it’s historical context and help the reader understand Paul’s Roman context.   It’s also extremely accessible.  Many commentaries are extremely technical in nature and this book is not.  Therefore, it’s far more useful for actual preaching than most commentaries I’ve looked it. They also make interesting use of an imaginary critic who helps them engage some of the immediate objections to their work.

One of the parts of the book that I appreciated the most was that this book can clearly be termed “post-modern”.  This is a serious attempt to engage the two extremes of our society – the radically modern “there is one set of universally accessible absolute truths” and the other radically modern nihilism “to each his own truth and don’t try and interfere with each other”.  In so doing this book isn’t reactionary, but rather a serious attempt to engage contemporary Western culture.  And on that note, Walsh and Keesmat wrote this book with their bible in one hand, and their newspapers/internet/television in the other – there is no question that their desire was to contextualize the message of Colossians to our culture.  If more preaching was like Walsh and Keesmat’s writing then the church might not be as irrelevant as it seems we are.

That being said, the most interesting part of Walsh and Keesmat’s book is their social analysis – and this is where I think the book falls flat on its face.  Walsh and Keesmat would definitely be described as having a more “liberal” outlook on political and social life.  Their book is full of anti-United States rhetoric as well as anti-free market comments.  The number one enemy in the eyes of Walsh and Keesmat’s eyes are large multi-national corporations that prey on the developing world.  They also tend to target corporate CEO’s as the symbols of evil in the world.  They also spend time decrying consumerism and marketing, etc.  Also on their list of targets are chain stores and supermarkets, etc.

Now, really, I have not objection with any of this.  It’s not that I agree entirely, but I think they have some good points.  My problem is in the hypocrisy that is exposed.  On one page Walsh and Keesmat talk at length about the value of all people and about how its dangerous to objectify someone or something because it enables us to hate them.  On the very next page they piecemeal quotes from corporate CEOs and set them up as straw men who epitomize evil.  Literally on the next page they do exactly what they said we shouldn’t do on the page before.

My other critique is that they published with IVP.  Now, I like IVP – my issue is not with their choice of publishers but rather that they used a multi-national publishing house that is known to pay their authors quite well (comparatively).  If Walsh and Keesmat were serious about everything they wrote, they would have self-published it as a simple PDF file rather than giving it to a major publishing house to put a fancy cover on it, market it, and sell it through large chain stores.

Walsh and Keesmat do eventually retreat from their hardline anti-corporate stance because, well, they have to.  They acknowledge that because we live in a society that has adopted a consumer economy that our very livelihoods depend on being consumers.  To that end, they do offer helpful suggestions for living lives mindful of justice (using food co-ops, public transportation, etc.) but they cranked their rhetoric up quite a bit more than was needed in my opinion.

That critique aside, as long as you don’t mind the anti-coporate and anti-american rehetoric I think there is a great deal to be gained by reading this book.

Categories: Reading

Monday Morning Musings

October 15, 2007 1 comment

This past Friday and Saturday I was part of “Always Reforming: Reformed and Always Reforming”. I was apart of the planning team for this event so my opinion is obviously biased. But I think all in all this Presbymergent event was a success.

This weekend I presented a workshop entitles “Emergence in Traditional Churches: Traching Existing Faith Communities to Speak a New Language”. The idea of the workshop was to help those serving in existing churches respong to “emergence”. I defined emergence as the call of the Holy Spirit to reach out to people currently not being reached by that faith community. One person commented to me that this topic wasn’t being discussed in other venues so it was good to hear that my voice added something

A few weeks ago I presented an introductory workshop on Youth Ministry as part of a teacher training workshop. I went through some basic theological and practical foundations of Youth Ministry and then delved into some “how to” material.

In doing these two workshops I learned a few things. The first is that Youth Ministry is really my thing. I was able to present my talk with ease and address questions without too much trouble. I feel as though I’ve read enough of the “major” works in Youth Ministry and that I’ve been doing it long enough that I can speak with some level of authority and competence. I think my topic this past week was a more difficult one and perhaps a bit more uncharted which contributed to the challenge.

The other thing is I now realize that in a presentation it’s easy to sound like you know exactly what you’re doing when in reality you still have the same struggles as everyone else. Now that I’ve done presentations I don’t think as highly of the speakers I’ve heard at Youth Specialties. No doubt they were good at what they did, but they had their good times and bad times as well.

In any event presenting was a ton of fun and I hope I was able to help some fellow journeyer in the work as part of God’s work in the world.